I think even YouTube/FaceBook/Flickr started along those lines. Hell, even Jimmy Wales was running a porn website ring before focusing on Wikipedia full time.
Nothing wrong at all. I think he used it to finance wikipedia/nupedia in the early stages though. I just tried to give examples of things that started not necessarily with the thought of making the world a better place.
I think the problem here is that evil is relative. You might say that porn is evil and find a reasonable argument for it.
And somebody else might not see porn as evil but just as something enjoyable that he likes. If this person creates a porn company, how can he and his company be considered evil if he genuinely can't see why porn would be considered evil?
Same way as drugs and alcohol are evil. They create addictions and harm the users. Sure, everything can be used in moderation, but are moderate users of these things the exception or the rule?
I'd like to see some empirical evidence that moderate users are the exception, not the rule. Man smokes weed once a month in his home is not nearly so great a headline as "crack addict leaves baby at grocery store."
Uh, how much does the adult entertainment industry make compared to any other internet industry? I thought it was a truism that the internet runs on porn...
Even without stats, it just seems like something that's blatantly obvious. It's a very common problem with couples for the guy to be lusting after other women. We, as a culture, are inundated with erotica. The internet allows people to look at pretty much anything they want in privacy. There are loads of adds for web history cleaners. Etc.
It just doesn't seem like a hard conclusion to draw...
I find it ironic your empirical evidence is a sensationalistic article with no empirical evidence. I was hoping for better.
Porn makes money therefore it is abused? Lusting after other women predates the modern porn industry. For example, "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors wife."
Very often our assumptions about what "must be" are wrong.
Why is it sensational? I might look for stats later, but surely a certified professional in the field has some credibility.
"Porn makes money therefore it is abused"
That isn't what I'm saying. Porn makes so much more money than any other online industry that it seems very likely the money comes from abuse. Similar to why the drug trade is so lucrative.
Also, I did not say lust is a new phenomena. In fact, you agree with my point. Since it is such a common aspect of being a male throughout history, then it seems easy to infer men are likely to indulge in an easy outlet for eroticism.
So you don't think men have a significant problem with pornography addiction, and/or viewing porn has bad effects on relationships between men and women?
Despite it being a conservative claim, and consequently people don't like it, the breakdown of the family is a very big problem.
Rape and murder and the like aren't the biggest problems. If you get rid of them by emasculating men and destroying human relationships, I'd say that's a bigger loss.
> the breakdown of the family is a very big problem.
Why assume that "the family" is perfect as it is? If the freedom to trade money for videos is detrimental to a social structure, to limit freedom to preserve a social structure seems regressive.
What's wrong with Jimmy Wales operating a porn site? I don't see how that's related to Wikipedia.