[cycrutchfield]

> Clearly

The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate that Schneiderman is acting here to protect the banking system and not acting to protect his constituents from being defrauded.

[Sangermaine]

Proof is obviously just another trick by the statist stooges conspiring to hold back cryptocurrencies.

[tedunangst]

Don't need proof if you've got proof of work...

[snissn]

He has motivation to protect the legacy banking system and all unenumerated motivations as well.

[s73v3r_]

Then it should be trivial for you to provide proof of this accusation.

[cycrutchfield]

What part of "burden of proof" do you not understand?

[snissn]

Believe whatever you want