|
|
|
|
|
|
by craftyguy
2981 days ago
|
|
|
> when a leading cause of death for most humans was regional strife What leads you to believe that was ever a major cause of death for more than a tiny handful of people? It would seem the hardships of living before modern medicine and (any) agriculture would have killed far more people. Given how expensive/risky it was to collect food, why would any group of folks risk most of their healthy, strong brood to wage regional conflict? If they lost, all of them would lose by virtue of losing the most capable members of the society. |
|
|