[trevyn]

>it is plain wrong

>Not sure what is meant

Which is it? :-)

As I interpret it, this article is not a scientific description of a particular physical system, but a metaphor.

That said, it does make sense in the signal domain. Consider electrical and optical resonance. It gets more interesting when the components are complex-valued.

[mike555]

It's the first one :)

This page is more about constructive interference than it is about resonance. Maybe that's what you are thinking about also?

[trevyn]

So you’re saying the page is simply incorrect and hints at no interesting ideas?

I see the world as composed of interconnected entities which metaphorically influence and resonate with each other, and there is a lesson in the creation of (metaphorical) power by the closer synchronization of these entities.

I extrapolate the implications of this as literally revealing a path leading to world peace.

In sum, I enjoy thought-provoking interpretations way more than thought-restricting interpretations.

[mike555]

It was never my intention to hate or shut out any possible metaphorical ideas.

I first heard of Bret couple times already in a very favourable light and he's on my read todo list.

The thing is that I have one very specific definition of resonance in my mind based on my line of work. Still I do believe it's always good to be open to different interpretations ...

[coldtea]

>I see the world as composed of interconnected entities which metaphorically influence and resonate with each other, and there is a lesson in the creation of (metaphorical) power by the closer synchronization of these entities.

Well, half of Sedona residents would agree. But that doesn't describe anything specific of the physical world that a post on physics (as the post appears to intend to be) would cover.