Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nugi 2990 days ago
But the information in the case being discussed is factually true, and undisputed. Why argue like its not literally the case here?
1 comments

My point is that the law is important even for the cases that the parent agrees with. There are clear categorizes for what qualifies for RTBF and they were examined well in this case. The judge rightfully determined that one person has likely changed and shouldn't be burdened by their history, but that another should.

This isn't just a blanket "you can erase things you don't like in the news about you" that some people have made it out to be.