[peterhadlaw]

I think we should make sure to let people do what makes them truly happy. It should be okay for someone to prioritize their family over a job if that's what they want to do.

There's a strong movement, through social pressures, making it not "okay" to do that.

Just like it should be okay to be a workaholic if that's what helps you sleep, on the couch, at night

[rhapsodic]

>Just like it should be okay to be a workaholic if that's what helps you sleep, on the couch, at night

The problem is that workaholic men who put their career ahead of their family do better in their career than women who put their family first. So the social pressure is for men to change their life choices, and companies to change their cultures, to accommodate women.

[peterhadlaw]

> <class A> who prioritizes their career do better, in their career, than <class B> who prioritizes something other than their career>.

Is that not how things are supposed to work?

[rhapsodic]

>Is that not how things are supposed to work?

Yes, in my view. Not, apparently, in the collective view of our society. If that happens too much in a particular company, like Microsoft, they're subject to government pressure and unfavorable public scrutiny like this article. We simply cannot allow companies to have hard-driving, workaholic cultures if it means that most of the benefits accrue to men rather than women.

Popular media is constantly reminding me that woman are strong, invincible, fierce and independent. And yet I'm also constantly told that men have to change their behaviors to accommodate women.