How should one deploy such a product at all?
Actual usage is really the only way anyone will know if the models are trained appropriately to handle most/all situations they will encounter in the real world.
> Actual usage is really the only way anyone will know if the models are trained appropriately to handle most/all situations they will encounter in the real world.
Because testing stuff before throwing it on the market isn't a thing anymore?
Surely you do not assume that Tesla had done no testing at all before selling these things.
I forewent commenting on their pre-market testing because I assumed that flokie already knew that the cars and ML models they use had been extensively tested on tracks and in simulation before the first Tesla was allowed on California roads.
And they would have be complete idiots had they not done such testing, no investors would have funded that.
Reactions like flokie's were completely predictable the moment driver assistance techniques were thought of. The only acceptable response a company can have to such criticism is "we have tested this extensively and it is safer than driving manually".
Market forces aside, no car drives on roads in any US state without extensive testing and certification. All of the companies testing self-driving technology had to get special permits to do so.