Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bilkoo 2995 days ago
Prompted by this comment I looked up Theranos' investors. Turns out Rupert Murdoch was in Series A. What irony!

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/theranos/investors/i...

4 comments

But it does speak well of journalistic independence at the WSJ.
This is interesting. Are there regulations mandating public access to this information?
Why is that ironic?
Rupert Murdoch owns the WSJ, which ran the major investigation that caused Theranos to first unravel:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/nov/29/rupert-murdoch...

Nearly as ironic: the first public big splash article about Theranos was a puff piece in the WSJ by a Pulitzer Prize winner (the investigative story was from a 2-time Pulitzer winner, John Carreyrou)

http://archive.is/8dfJ7

Poor Rupert, doesnt have much luck with tech. He also bought MySpace at its peak and I think lost $700mil pretty quickly.
If anyone deserves to lose fortunes, it is him.