Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by trigger 2996 days ago
Ironic that to read this article I have to subscribe to the Enconomist.
4 comments

And while you can do this online, changing your subscription or cancelling it can only be done over the phone. You can't even change your method of payment online.
Cancelling at least can be done by email.
I'm not sure about the specifics, but in the EU it's not legal to offer a sign-up method that is not available as cancellation method.
Do you have a source for that? The Economist certainly doesn't, cancellation online is not possible but sign-up is.

The email method didn't work for me last time, I just got a reply asking me to call them.

Hm, I could have sworn I read about it a few years back that it was introduced. Also, it might have been only Germany? Can't find anything as google has the worst result for that search I've ever seen.
Just delete all the cookies. I do this all the time on `The New Yorker` because their followup/linked articles on a topic turn out to be a lot more.
Funny thing is, the article is there, I just deleted all the paywall elements in chrome then turned off the display:none styling on the blog-post__text element
Is this legal?
Your browser has downloaded it anyway, so you may as well read it. If they cared that much then they'd hide it better.
I'm not a fan of paywalls and believe a user should be allowed to do what they want with the data the browser downloads - but in general "if they really cared, they'd do more to stop me" is not how you should approach questions of legality.
I've paid for my internet connection and content that they willingly put on their server without any security protection has been downloaded to my computer. Now that I have that content I'll read it if I want to.
Try that with money accidentally put into your bank account.

You can keep repeating it over your shoulder to the judge as you are marched to prison for theft if you take it and can’t replace it.

Try that with a piece of mail that was sent to your house on accident. It’s a federal crime to open that envelope. The law doesn’t care that it was delivered to you.

Try removing the DRM from your DVD and making a copy of ‘your data’ on the disk you bought. A federal crime has been committed.

In this instance I would guess no laws are broken because no one powerful enough to make it illega has cared enough about the tiny fraction of people able to get around their tricks yet.

Absolutely - and in the given case, it's perfectly fine to do so because it's in fact legal (to my knowledge).

However, if you e.g. wanted to record a Netflix stream from the EME applet on their website, you could argue the same moral justifications - however, now you'd be breaking a law (circumvention of protection devices) and it wouldn't be legal, no matter how stupid the law is.

"I've paid for my internet connection"

Your internet connection bill is not the same as the bill for the content.

yes, well, at least where I live it is. you can just go "view source" and read the article in raw text. You can use anything to make the http request really. Completely up to you what tools on your computer you want to use to render it.
How would it not be?
Does it honestly matter?
I actually thought that article limit banner was part of a sarcastic intro. Was not.