|
|
|
|
|
by Fnoord
2996 days ago
|
|
> What you're describing seems to be pretty much exactly polarization. [...] It is, but its also more. OP wrote: > The moment that you make a content that advertisers might find controversial you risk losing your reward for that content so advertising financed media fails to capture anything beyond the mainstream entertainment. This described self-censorship. Wikipedia has a nice article about that, including many examples. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-censorship |
|
It's a process that maintains the existing polarization.