|
|
|
|
|
|
by terminado
2990 days ago
|
|
|
There's no legal framework, to distinguish devices that matter from devices that don't. There's no clear demarcation between devising a convenient contraption, versus implementing an inadvisable hack that leads to a hazardous outcome, especially within the scope of web based systems, since no portion of the internet is to be regarded as reliable life-saving infrastructure. I think the mistake is to trust packet-switched networks and peer-oriented protocols as reliable systems at all. If you cannot control the whole system, end-to-end, and any unwitting peer can over-consume bandwidth (jamming traffic and communication with interference), effectively cutting you off from a necessity, why would you bet your life on the availability of that system? |
|
|