[forgot-account]

He was looking at different data then they were looking at.

[PeterisP]

Why?

I mean, there seems to be no reasonable reason why that should be the case, he can see (and be notified) of everything they're seeing and he can substantiate his decision by pointing towards the data, and should do so - because in this case the other officers might have noticed problems with that data.

[sdhgaiojfsa]

If that were all it was, then why are the investigators surprised by his decision-making?