|
|
|
|
|
by piracykills
3006 days ago
|
|
If you read the details of that decision, they're pretty interesting - they only did it because people were claiming CloudFlare were supporting their ideas. Matthew Prince basically said "this is dangerous" and a month or two later that exact decision was being used against them in court to take down a copyright infringer. Not saying one way or another about it being a good or bad decision, but they definitely knew they were setting a scary precedent when they did it. |
|