|
|
|
|
|
|
by cgriswald
3004 days ago
|
|
|
Your post is one of the more bizarre things I have read on HN. On the one hand, you ask for evidence. On the other hand, you admit it happened? Then you suggest that it is not important because it is "not statistically significant enough", as if the numbers you mentioned aren't staggering? That's a bit like saying it wouldn't be significant if Rhode Island fell into the Atlantic because it only affects a tiny percent of people on Earth. Is statistical significance the only significance there is...? |
|
|