Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jabv 2998 days ago
I'm sorry, is your argument based on the current year? I presume you mean otherwise, but that's how it's written.
1 comments

Yes, and it's a perfectly fair argument.

Content hosting sites are supposed to host content. That's what they do. If a site doesn't work under unusual but not outrageous conditions, it's fundamentally broken and not fit for purpose.

The industry should be much less tolerant of excuses for tools and systems that perform poorly under load. It's had a couple of decades to get this right now. How is it acceptable that this is even a problem?