[IAmEveryone]

https://web.archive.org/web/20180130105751/https://wonderuni... reads like the output of a text generator trained on two newsgroups: One focussing on conspiracy theories, the other on Open Source licensing.

You are obviously trying to underhandedly gain adoption to then turn commercial.

It's perfectly fine to give out free versions with restrictions on redistribution and commercial use. Publishing the source code in such an arrangement is even laudable.

But it is not Open Source. Those words have meaning, and I have no doubts that you know as much. E

ven if not: I assure you that 90%+ of your contributors are under the impression that they are contributing to a FOSS project as it is commonly understood.

If you are using the free Github plan, you're also breaking their terms.

This is not ok.