Tesla being lead by a person with lots of past success including getting ready to setup a colony on Mars - you probably can stretch out the risk a little further than compared to say, most anyone else. There are a lot of people, including those with wealth, who will want to see Tesla succeed even if that requires certain unusual measures for a public company; I doubt it will come to this.
I mean I get what your saying and I agree that Elon's reputation and past success should skew the risk equation a little in Elon's favor. But the risk question is not "being stretched a little" is been completely thrown out. There is absolutely no logic to why a company that produced 100,000 cars/year for a total loss of 2 billion is worth 2x a company that produced 6,200,000 cars/year with total profits of 7.2 billion. (That is not even mentioning the 12 billion in cash reserves held by Ford). I love Tesla/SpaceX/Elon as much as the next millennial but I would not touch Tesla stock with a 10ft pole.
> There is absolutely no logic to why a company that produced 100,000 cars/year for a total loss of 2 billion is worth 2x a company that produced 6,200,000 cars/year with total profits of 7.2 billion.
A company's valuation is determined by expectations for the future.
Everything is exponential. If most people are a 1 or 2, and Elon is a 3 - that's a huge lead/advantage that on an exponential scale puts him more than a little ahead.
Good catch on the wording, thanks for pointing it out.
To clarify, the past success part of the future colony on Mars is in the groundwork he has already laid with Tesla/Solar City, SpaceX, Boring Company -- all necessary technology for a proper foundation of a colony.