|
|
|
|
|
by kodablah
3006 days ago
|
|
> Why would they want to be in the messy business of running a carrier Does Fi run the carrier? I thought it used existing carriers and just supported seamless transition between them (and wifi). Regardless, the motivation would be to get that market they're missing that doesn't use one of the big 4. Granted Apple has never catered to that market, so not sure why they would now (it'd actually be detrimental to them IMO). EDIT: Oh, and to the GP's point, seamless international use of your phone is a premium feature that might be valuable to customers. You could easily say "why do ____, they are already considered first class" for any new feature. |
|
Fi's base price[0] is $20/mo + tax. Hallon (my current provider) will sell you 8GB/mo of data for $18/mo, tax included.[1] With Fi that would cost you.. $80/mo + tax. Hallon doesn't actually have anything comparable to that, price-wise; their most expensive plan is 100GB/mo at ~$40.
And no, population density is not an excuse either. According to Wikipedia[2], the US' population density is 33 ppl/km², where Sweden has 23 ppl/km².
Doesn't seem to be the economy either, the GDP per capita seems to within ~20%[3], and that's before taking into account the massive difference in income equality.
I'd love if someone could explain how this price difference is somehow reasonable, because this just boggles my mind completely.
[0]: https://fi.google.com/about/plan/
[1]: https://www.hallon.se/vara-produkter/mobiltelefoni/mobilabon...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependen...
[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)...