Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by smokeyj 3004 days ago
You could just point the miner at another pool and keep 100% of the shares. Cutting out CoinHive is trivially simple.

I really don't get the problem though. Someone's website is hacked and points to coinhive, and we want coinhive to fix it? This is why we can't have nice things.

1 comments

We want Coinhive to not benefit from it.
Browser mining is basically worthless. If they're running a pool then they have to pay server usage to validate low value shares. I'm not sure CoinHive is even economically viable.

Meanwhile, Google - the multi billion dollar public company, is the one distributing this script through online ads..