|
|
|
|
|
by Gibbon1
3012 days ago
|
|
You go way back into the 1980's every compiler vendor was trying to drink your milkshake[1] via licensing fees for compilers and libraries. Two companies that didn't do that were Microsoft, Borland. AT&T was forbidden from selling products outside of Telcom. Which is why Linux and C/C++ succeeded. C succeeded because a competent grad student could port the language to a new computer in a two months. So you could use Microsofts Basic and C/C++ compilers, Borlands Pascal and C/C++ compilers, or gcc/etc C compilers without the them sharing ownership of your compiled binaries. [1] Per unit licensing fees. Meaning instead of just charging you a seat license, they wanted a cut of your profit as well. You pay use $20 for every license you sell. I'm not kidding about $20 either. |
|