|
|
|
|
|
by ajross
3012 days ago
|
|
That's moving the goalposts. The point upthread was that splitting a single deposit made you "a criminal guilty of structuring". But yeah, sorta: if you are repeatedly splitting such deposits in exactly the way needed to avoid reporting and scrutiny, and don't have a valid non-structuring explanation, those facts are going to go a long way toward proving intent in the minds of a jury. Would you seriously argue otherwise? |
|