[zbentley]

That person sounds really poorly-adjusted, agenda'd, and borderline-hateful.

Not only are many of his claims dubious, unwarranted, or hyperbolic, but there are a few gems like this:

> Remember when the CEO globally emailed a picture of his ugly newborn and drugged up post-birth wife to the entire company because he thinks we all submit to his cult of personality?

It's not uncommon for that to happen. People share pictures of their new kids to their departments and whole companies all the time. Usually it's because new kids are a joyful experience, for, y'know, humans in general. CEOs do it too--for cynical reasons or not--and raging against that, to say nothing of the criticism of the "drugged-up" mother (epidural anesthesia is incredibly helpful and medically essential in tons of births), displays a somewhat shocking failure to grasp typical corporate-people behavior in America at best, and an axe-to-grind willingness to engage in ad-hominem slander of people's families at worst.

Even if any of his claims have merit, I have a ton of trouble believing anything from someone who talks like that.