|
|
|
|
|
by nicolasbistolfi
3014 days ago
|
|
Remember when people used two floppy disks to save files so if one floppy break you have a backup one? I remember the first day I heard about Dropbox and I was amazed by it, it made perfect sense. Since then I'm a client and as an entrepreneur, it's a company I always looked up to. |
|
Dropbox might've been the first in the field, but it has no selling point above STACK for me since it doesn't implement public key cryptography just like the other providers. Google's sell point is that compressed photos are free storage (although -obviously- unencrypted).
Which suggests, to me, that they're accessing the data or perhaps saving a few GBs with say ZFS dedup (ultimately not a trade-off in the interest of the user). Because otherwise, the lag would be client-side only (after all, the clients employ the cryptography).
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Tridgell