|
|
|
|
|
|
by scrub_tier
3007 days ago
|
|
|
Undoubtedly supressors do decrease gas discharge from the muzzle and increase the safety of the system to the user. However, I feel you've chosen a best case scenario and haven't addressed my other points. Subsonic ammunition is easy to press and real suppressors use closed rubber wipes which are only good for a couple shots. I hadn't intended to make that point a technical critique of suppressive technology so much as an indication of the perceived need over other options. When would I need a suppressor? If I'm not shooting on a range where everyone SHOULD have headgear, then I'm hunting far away from hopefully all society and being safe about it? Regardless, I appreciate your candor. |
|
|
"real"? i don't think any of those are even available for purchase. take a look at thunderbeast arms or silencerco for what "real" suppressors look like.
they're astonishingly effective, and last for forever. (which is important when it takes 12 months to get one.)
> When would I need a suppressor? If I'm not shooting on a range where everyone SHOULD have headgear
ugh, have you ever even stood next to someone setting off a hunting rifle?
suppressors are additive with ear protection (super useful for anyone with hearing damage), and also eliminate the whole-body experience of the blast.