|
|
|
|
|
by headmelted
3012 days ago
|
|
If the implication in this is that in some way investment was made in exchange for anything "else" from Elizabeth Holmes, then I have to say that I haven't seen any reason to think that and it's offensive to suggest that any kind of sex-for-investment scenario was happening without any basis for believing that. I may have completely misunderstood what was being suggested here though.. |
|