|
|
|
|
|
by mrlala
3018 days ago
|
|
>This is only a problem because we allowed the web to become centralized around a few large hubs But that's also in the best interested of everyone. Instead of youtube, we should visit 10 different video sites?
Instead of reddit, we should visit 10 different global info sources that now have 10x less content, and spend even more time finding what's relevant?
Instead of twitch, we should visit 10 different sites to watch streams? It's the natural order of things.. there's no way to have a LOT of different sites that also contain basically everything you want. |
|
The only thing you'd lose is the unified user profile but we have the tools to have distributed identities (oauth and friends). Before the era of social networks having mililon of forums for niche topics was common. Now you just create a subreddit instead.
Want to talk about knitting? Search for "knitting discussion online". Here are a few results: https://www.houzz.com/discussions/knitting-and-crocheting https://crochettalk.com/ http://www.knittingparadise.com/active-topic-list
Each site does not contain "everything I want" but each fills a particular niche. The fact that you actually have to search for them to find them can actually be seen as a bonus, you don't have the sort of "cross-contamination" you can observe on reddit when a community is suddenly popular enough to propelled into the frontpage and you have an influx of people who overrun your community and destroy its "culture".
Should reddit disappear tomorrow I'm sure we'll do just fine. Youtube is more complex because video hosting is much more demanding in terms of resources.