|
|
|
|
|
by secstate
3006 days ago
|
|
What's stopping the harassers from setting up a secondary Slack install for coordination of such nefarious ends? The only use I can see for this would be evidence after the fact. Surveillance is almost never the proper way to enforce acceptable standards of behavior. |
|
Company policy for one could be applicable.
You’re missing the point though, what you do with non-company provided tools is held to a different standard from officially blessed and sanctioned ones.