Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Lightbody 3006 days ago
I'm super frustrated with Facebook, but this is conspiracy theory territory. Place the anger in the right direction.

Those trades were part of his 10b5-1, a scheduled trading plan set in place at a minimum 3 months ahead of time and typically extends out 12+ months. Trades in the plan are protected from insider trading accusations and considered an "affirmative defense" [1].

While you can trade shares outside your 10b5-1 plan, those trades aren't protected from insider trading accusations.

[1] https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/03/24/a-guide-to-rule-1...

3 comments

Considering the time scales we're playing with here, 3 months is more than enough time to delay reporting and let 10b5-1 sales trigger to salvage as much value as possible.

Shoot, Stamos had apparently been nagging them for a while leading up to the December reorg, and we're only just hearing about it.

Can they cancel planned sells though? If so, it seems this would be a great way to get around insider trading laws. Just always have a bunch of sells scheduled, and cancel them if you don't need them.
Both links contain facts not stories.

You came up with the idea that there would be a conspiracy. You are the conspiracy theorist.

It's a conspiracy theory to state or insuniate that Zuckerberg is committing a crime in order to save some money.

Especially given that the facts are that (a) selling stock involves a lot of people, (b) Zuckerberg has gone on record saying he will be selling stock, (c) he has plans for politics/philanthropy which will depend on an intact reputation and (d) he will be so rich i.e. multi-billionaire regardless that it seems strange to risk jail time for a few hundred million.

If you make claims. Then you need to back them up.

I didn't make claims nor did anyone else. There's only facts that he's been selling stock.