Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by abritinthebay 3006 days ago
Why? The error seems reasonable (radiation can and could have flipped bits, I've done it on sensitive hardware with a camera flash).
2 comments

1. anonymous Sergey as a story source, without any verificable identity.

2. "he went drinking with a few military personnel", so it's retelling of rehearsal, even more trust.

3. "government plan was to mix the meat from Chernobyl-area cattle with the uncontaminated meat", that's seems plausible. contamination of meat was "up to 1,0*10-6 Ci/kg" (according to widely cited secret "annex 10 of protocol #32"), it's 300 times of banana equivalent. from the same scary stories fansites, there were 34 Кtons of bad meat (it's one thousand of railway carriages btw). so not so dramatic, definitely not a near nuclear blast.

4. [computer was] "located in a building close to the railroad tracks". inverse-square law, walls, exposure time from a moving train etc. i would more believe in vibration caused by trains as a cause of problems.

5. the SM-1800 computer: KR580VM80A cpu (8080 clone) is 6 mkm and 2 MHz (compare to modern 10 nm and 2 GHz), K565RU3A ram (4116 analog, like in ZX Spectrum), and other components. even the computer case was solid metal. i can not tell you precisely, but there should be a powerful source of radiation to crash such computer reproducibly.

so no, i don't buy it. sorry for hurting your radio- and russo-fobias.

> sorry for hurting your radio- and russo-fobias.

That's a mighty big chip you have on your shoulder there. Sorry to disappoint your ego but I was curious as to your objections. They're... not very good.

The inverse square law one is the worst - you make tons of assumptions about the building and then screw up the basic science. A few inches of lead is enough to block gamma rays -- which is why you wear a lead apron when you get x-rays -- but at least 3 meters of concrete are needed to stop them.

Assuming a standard brick or breeze block building and normal computer metal case plus a meter or two of separation (common at railways in Europe at least, when stuff is going by slowly) that wouldn't stop much gamma radiation at all.

Other than "it's a semi-anonymous story" you really don't have much in the way of objection here.

Odds are the camera flash discharge caused electromagnetic interference (EMI) that disturbed your electronics rather than the visible light and UV radiation from the flash itself. Wafers are photo sensitive, but light is blocked by the packaging. Did you have decapped parts?
God knows - it was a very old machine that I was taking pictures of. Caused a reboot (and was reproducable).
Could have been the same cause as the one that made Raspberry Pi 2 power off -- https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/xenon-death-flash-a-free-ph...