[iamvfl]

I think there is likely a common need for a set of standard training models. This may hinder innovation for some time, but it's a cost we should accept when releasing a potentially dangerous technology to the public. It would have the added benefit of multiple companies contributing to a common self-driving standard which could accelerate its development.

That being said, when the first real cars were introduced to the world and later improved upon there were many more fatalities than we're likely to experience with self-driving technology.

[icc97]

As commented in another thread here [0], HAL at Duke University [1] is putting forward proposals for this.

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16620439

[1]: https://hal.pratt.duke.edu/research

[donatj]

I'm sorry, but this is silly.

Every technology is dangerous. Every technology costs lives to some extent when spread across billions of people. I'm sure forks take more lives each year than self driving cars.

Weigh this against the potential lives saved. I posit you'd be killing more people with drunk drivers by slowing innovation than you'd be saving via luddism.

[skookumchuck]

The first real cars, dangerous as they were, were far safer than horses.