Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by p0peax 3008 days ago
Error handling on signals are such and easy thing to put off and "do later." Even though the signals often will tell you something about how to error correct.

In one way I feel like the title for the paper is not correct, in the conclusion, they state that testing all these signals is not straight forward. But in my experience, a lot of critical failures could be prevented with very simple automated testing.

1 comments

Agree with you totally.