|
|
|
|
|
|
by lynaghk
3007 days ago
|
|
|
Author here. I'm compiling Rust to WASM on another project, so I can address this question.
I haven't studied relative perf, so can't make any claims there. But for this application your guess is correct: It's iterop.
It's easier to go with Rust via Neon rather than WASM because Finda needs to: + Walk the filesystem for file results + Call OS X CoreGraphics APIs to list windows + Run a websocket server to collect results from browsers and VSCode All of this requires leaving the browser sandbox, and so can't be done in WASM. |
|
|