[barry-cotter]

Google, Amazon, Microsoft etc. are still there. The US can still produce steel and computer chips. Other countries subsidising domestic production of software, steel and computer chips did not lead to the US being unable to do so.

And amazon is pretty big in China, taobao and jingdong are just bigger and better.

[andosa]

Yes, they are still there, but the protectionism is what allowed the local companies (Baidu, Tencent, Alibaba etc) to compete initially and be better in the end. Whereas in EU, local competition has been crushed and it is now stuck with the monopolies.

[barry-cotter]

Baidu is still not better than Google, even in Chinese, for what it’s worth.

Infant industry protection may make sense in some cases but it’s more commonly used as a smokescreen for corruption. It was used as a justification for high tariffs and low quality domestically produced goods all over the world throughout the 50s to at least the 80s.

If the EU doesn’t have much in the way of domestic IT companies so what? They’re still rich. The fact that others are getting rich in other, different ways does not make them poorer.

[dahdum]

It makes the EU asymmetrically dependent, which is not a good position in a competitive world.