"Blacklist all by default, whitelist as needed" is how we build most secure systems right? I'll admit it feels strange applying that construct to day to day browsing.
I have started using a "Quick Javascript Switcher" extension some years ago to easily opt-in for certain pages but have js disabled by default.
This was one of the best quality of life decision in terms of web browsing I have ever made.
The vast majority of pages that I randomly access (e.g. from hacker news) are text based and usually work just fine without js. But the time until I can start reading is much faster (less jumping around of content) and I don't get the growth hackers modals shoven down my throat two paragraphs in. The pages I use regularly are usually white listed
More like "disabled by default," actually. It's mostly ads/tracking, popovers, and other annoyances, and it's easy to selectively turn it back on where you really need it. This approach isn't for the general public yet.
No page shows JavaScript for me until I enable it with NoScript. It's too sad that Firefox Focus on Android doesn't allow plugins or disabling JS, it make it makes the whole thing pointless.
I mean, I personally don't care; I've always been a little weird. But it is funny to see technical preferences as a signaling mechanism.
Funny, that is, until it hits a certain point... http://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-cre...