[azinman2]

So that’s a lot of hypothesizing going on with no evidence. But all of this begs the question, why is it strange that stuxnet wasn’t mentioned in the article? Still seems to me you haven’t answered that. If you want to extend into hypothetical land, then all kinds of attacks on industrial controls and breakins should be mentioned. But they’re not, because the article is more focused on the individual event.

[abiox]

it's not strange if you're fond of the narrative being shaped as being more anti-iran than a broader context would necessarily support.

media strategically omits a variety of things to support whatever messaging they're going for.