[shady-lady]

I would reject that PR.

Something like that change should have a message explaining why that change is proposed.

Unfortunate that the blogpost itself can't be forked :p

[jeffbarr]

I wrote it -- do I need to make a fix??

[shady-lady]

well, it depends on what type of comments you guys find acceptable & would want to see when you're deciding whether to merge the changes in.

imagine down the line somebody submitting changes & the message isn't the reason why those changes are there[0] but instead a copy paste of the changes[1]

[0] e.g. "remove fuzzy language"/"update intro to more accurately reflect addition of new services"

[1] not denying that sometimes this makes more sense.