|
|
|
|
|
by staunch
5768 days ago
|
|
Her point about thinking for yourself is condescending. She's hardly alone in believing that she's a critical thinker that evaluates advice objectively. Everyone thinks that about themselves. No one thinks they're a monkey. Regarding the post she's replying to, she didn't provide any evidence that she's succeeded while ignoring the advice of experts. Her one example (which was 75% of her post) would be more convincing if it didn't seem like she was rationalizing her preexisting view point. She also describes that she has someone who is co-founder in all but name, which weakens the argument further. I have to admit that I'm uncomfortable with how much of PG's advice I agree with. There are probably a lot of little things I disagree with, but I can't think of any big ones. Between the previous thread and this submission I was hoping to have at least a few nuggets of disagreement to hold on to. Unfortunately that's not the case. |
|
I also agree with PG more than I agree with most people. The dude is smart and I'm happy to learn from him. It's the premise that I shouldn't sway from his advice that I was rejecting.
My experience doesn't qualify as success yet but more as 'so far ao good' but there are plenty of single founders who are so that condition is already satisfied.