|
|
|
|
|
by mfonda
3024 days ago
|
|
> There was no division of duties on the team. Everyone was responsible for the system as a whole. [...] Basically, I asked why he didn't take care of it. His response floored me. > "Oh, well, you always take care of it." I've found that it's almost never the case that there is no division of duties. Sure, there may be no explicit division of duties, but there is almost always an implicit division of duties. If Person X is always the one that handles Task Y, then the team will come to view Task Y as a duty of Person X. Other team members may then just simply assume that Person X will take care of it, or they may even actively avoid it to avoid stepping on anyone's toes. |
|
I have to wonder if structure is actually evolving away, or if it's just a side-effect of the internet birthing so many businesses that management skills are rare in general so people just figure they might as well do without. I'm not nostalgic for the Mad Men era and rigid org charts, but there has to be a better way. If careers are just going to be one long Choose Your Own Adventure game, we all might as well go contract and freelance.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_mentality