|
|
|
|
|
by andrew_
3026 days ago
|
|
Honest and noble intentions to be sure. But the author should have foreseen the consequences, or at least investigated similar services to see how they behave (and what Github and users typically consider acceptable). Greenkeeper.io for example, provides a very similar service for Node.js package dependencies - but it's opt-in, as Github support was quoted as mentioning in the article. All one needs to do is take a step back and take stock of how many real-life situations we find unsolicited anything acceptable, and the real potential for pitfall would've been clear. |
|