[tortoise1]

when they say co workers, whom do they mean? anyone in my company? some one whom i work with for 30 mins per week? some one with whom we work for 5 hours a day? some one whom i chat with through out the day as part of work?

>>They’re often more than twice as accurate.

which co worker is capable of being twice accurate than me in knowing about me.

So surprising, so magical and so flawed.

How do we destroy such bullshit analysis all over the internet.

Some where some normal person or even a smart person is going to read this and believe it to be true and is going to base this as source of his research and going to come up with a whole lot of new bullshit.

This concept of flawed non sense and noisy logic i think deserves its own word.

Any suggestions? How about SINFO ... any useful, meaningful info we can call as INFO and anything that is not useful or misleading or nonsense we can call it SINFO.

Because i think its a type of SIN to provide misleading information.