|
|
|
|
|
by wjy
5771 days ago
|
|
One possible justification would be it distorts the reality of what actually happened in the past. It alters conversations by removing a speaker, creating a hole. I'm not judging you one bit. I don't know which sites you were referring to, and you're clearly taking the nice-guy approach. But there are arguable reasons to not remove content just because someone is embarrassed of their past self. |
|
Let's take two different examples: facebook vs HN.
If we're looking at facebook then someone would have a really good case to have their account and all data associated with it removed if they asked for it. In some places that would be legally enforceable.
In the case of HN I think the contributions are woven in to the site so strongly that other peoples stuff would be negatively affected. In such a case I would propose to anonymize the writer.
This avoids the embarrassment but leaves the fabric largely in tact.