I guess that's subjective. I would have like to seen more proof to back up the argument.
The author provides proof that the Netflix startup story is about "rental fees" a long time ago. But then fails to provide any evidence that is not true.
The author then switches to Walmart to prove that founder stories are not true, but doesn't provide any evidence that people claim Walmart was an overnight success. Overall it's a bad article in my opinion.
The author provides proof that the Netflix startup story is about "rental fees" a long time ago. But then fails to provide any evidence that is not true.
The author then switches to Walmart to prove that founder stories are not true, but doesn't provide any evidence that people claim Walmart was an overnight success. Overall it's a bad article in my opinion.