|
|
|
|
|
by dalbasal
3030 days ago
|
|
Explicit consent is the principle I'm most curious (and pessimistic) about. It's one of those things that are very easy to describe in everyday terms, but almost impossible for legal enforcement to work with. There are rules about things banks have to inform you of, or pharmaceuticals. On the academic side, this can be effective. Disclosure and making information public. On the consumer side it is almost always disingenuous. Small print meticulously written by compliance officers and reviewed by regulators. No one seems capable of stepping back and asking "are consumers better informed." When internet service X wants you to know your card is about to expire, they make sure that you are informed. When a regulator wants you to be informed about cookies.... we get small print, and a nag screen making us promise that we read it. |
|