|
|
|
|
|
by AnthonyMouse
3026 days ago
|
|
> Paying back that loan in the normal way is neutral, preserving the money that was created. Actually it destroys the portion of the money that was created. Sort of. The bank doesn't get to keep the principal it originally created, it gets destroyed. But then they're back to having some slack against their reserve ratio, so they can immediately go recreate the money again and loan it to someone else. Which is how banks actually create money, and inflation -- by over time increasing the net amount of outstanding loan principal across all debtors. This is also why it's important to have the government create a certain amount of money -- it's necessary in order to allow people on net to pay down their loans without causing deflation. Or even to prevent people from having to increase their net real debt as the economy expands. And despite all the whinging about QE, the banks are still way ahead on the "average real debt per citizen" front. |
|
> This is also why it's important to have the government create a certain amount of money
Somehow it all worked fine before the fiat money system started in 1914. A century of incredible economic growth, and no net inflation.
Any analysis of the causes of inflation need to take into account the US from 1800-1914.