[viraptor]

If you're still selling to the US, I don't think this would protect you. Your product can be banned anyway.

[AnimalMuppet]

Your product could be banned, but the sue-er would never collect any money. So, if the sue-er is a patent troll, why would they bother? They don't care about banning competition. They'd burn a lot of money on lawyers for zero income. That's not a fight that they want to pick.

[viraptor]

Their gain would be a chance that you pay the fees. Because outside of specific local markets, no small game producer could afford dropping the US market (and possibly US-based delivery systems like Steam, Play, and AppStore) and succeed.

[oh_sigh]

Okay, they ban you, you lose all the US revenue. Then, other companies see that they may get banned as well and lose their revenue, so they give in.

[subroutine]

If the company was making 35k/yr operating in the US and you sue for 35k one-time fee, do you think they'd do it?

[gowld]

If you own an Estonian corporation, they can sue you.