Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mcny 3030 days ago
How would life improve for "minorities" in a democracy? Imagine China PR became a democracy. Would they keep the promises they made to Hong Kong?

UK is democratic. The current prime minister TM is from the same political party as her predecessor DC but nobody even talks about the promises made at the vote for creating an independent Wales.
2 comments
wkz 3030 days ago
The argument was not that freedom of speech follows from democracy. You could theoretically have an authoritarian rule that allowed unfiltered criticism against it. The argument was: not allowing freedom of speech is always wrong, independent of the type of governance.

I agree that democracy in itself does not guarantee rights for minorities. It depends on the majority adhering to a moral system that enshrines human equality. We know that this system can break down, a population can agree to subjugate some of its members. I would still rather put my trust in the majority over in one person and especially in a system that allows me to replace the government after some period of time.

link
Wildgoose 3030 days ago
There were no promises made for Welsh Independence. What are you talking about?
link
mcny 3030 days ago
Sorry. I was thinking Scotland. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/22/david-... https://archive.fo/ekq26
link
hardlianotion 3030 days ago
Not true. SNP talk about it all the time. "The Vow" is highly contentious. What you believe was promised largely depends on what side of the nationalist divide you sit on.
link
mcny 3029 days ago
> SNP talk about it all the time.

Sorry, I think I failed to be clear. I meant to signal the lack of the Tories talking about keeping their promise. SNP wants more devolution. It is silly for the English to say why Scotland should have a say in English affairs if the English should not have a say in Scotland.

> "The Vow" is highly contentious.

Well, of course it is.

> What you believe was promised largely depends on what side of the nationalist divide you sit on.

Isn't that very convenient? The way I understand it, Labour expects to win a lot of seats in Scotland so it is against their interest as well for Scotland to be independent?

In any case, the point is not how England screws over Scotland but rather use it as an example that a fully democratic government to replace China PR will still screw over Hong Kong and Tibet.

link