|
|
|
|
|
by Barrin92
3031 days ago
|
|
>That seems like a cultural thing, though - there's nothing biological to stop people from laying out a purpose for themselves and pursuing it. Purpose without existential risk of failure is not usually perceived as genuine. If you have enough money and only put a fraction of it to use, you might create things, but you're never really risking anything. I'd wager more people join the military for purpose than the local paintball team, not despite but because the former really puts your life at risk. |
|
Says who? That may be associated with lutheran ethics of hard work, but doesn't look like an universal nor an essential requirement. Was Mother Theresa devoid of purpose because there's no way she could fail at taking care of people?