[toasterlovin]

If saving the animals = more profit, then more animals will be saved. That's the argument, at least, not saying it's feasible.

[Can_Not]

All you did was repeat the argument without adding any plausible explanation.

[toasterlovin]

Is it really necessary to explain that people desire to enrich themselves, therefore they seek profit, therefore they will do things which resulted in profit?

[Can_Not]

It necessary to explain when you magically hand-wave in that it's going to benefit the environment and natural animal populations when all evidence and logic indicates the opposite.