|
|
|
|
|
by meow1032
3037 days ago
|
|
I can't help but feel that if Taleb put a little more effort into fleshing out his arguments I'd enjoy his writing a lot more. In most of what I've read from him, it always feels like he's more concerned with trying to make the reader feel smug about understanding his writing than actually trying to communicate anything meaningful. In this article, he has an aside where he complains that Agricultural Companies are running a smear campaign against him and are "idiots" and "naive". He seems to acknowledge that clearly there is some bound on this "minority rule" argument, but doesn't bother to further explore this, and instead goes on and writes as though no bound exists, or if it does, only exists when it benefits his argument. |
|
For instance, in many Muslim majority or even major minority countries, you do not have a universally halal food industry - most supermarkets are divided into "stuff (probably halal)" halal, and haram.
If he halved the time and volume he puts into making himself/his readers feel clever, he'd be far more convincing.
I know this because it's something I feel into for years, and still do on my first draft of much that I write.