|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
3041 days ago
|
|
Its actually very much unlike that. While the communities in the Eastern District of Texas did benefit from the popularity of the venue because frequent patent litigants -- one either side -- spend lots of money in those communities essentially trying to buy sympathy in the jury pool, those communities have essentially no control over the court rules that drive the popularity of the venue; its not a race-to-the-bottom competition like the Amazon HQ2 competition, and similar (usually less formalized) efforts to attract other big companies with tax abatements. |
|
You mean other than the people of the community that sit on juries and elect the judges?